Tobes,+Rachel

Submitted on Thursday, December 4, 2014 - 2:41pm Submitted by anonymous user: [72.48.99.38] Submitted values are:

Judge's Name: Rachel Tobes High School Graduation Date: 2001 Judge's e-mail: RachelTobes@gmail.com Experience: Frequently Judge Rounds Judged this topic: 30ish Judge Paradigm: Stock issues Rate of Delivery: 1 Slow Quantity of Arguments: 1 Few, well developed Topicality: 4 Moderately Rarely Counterplans: 4 rarely acceptable Generic Disadvantages: 5 unacceptable Conditional Negative Positions: 4 usually unacceptable Debate Theory Arguments: 3 sometimes acceptable Kritik arguments: 3 sometimes acceptable Overall judging paradigm: I love perspective and well developed arguments that show me a total understanding of the topic. How everything relates. For example, articulate the connection between funding and solvency - "if there's no money to pay for the enforcement/products/etc, then it can't work" type of conceptual development. I tend to be a stock issues judge, but lean towards the practicality of policy maker. There needs to be some sort of evidence to back up a theory, but too much evidence without depth is not enough to win an argument. I value the speaking style as much as the quality of the material. Speeches should be a convincing presentation, effectively communicating ideas. No bouncing, gasping, or hyperventilating spreading nonsense. Ethics Statement: Agree