Boehler,+Katie

Boehler, Katie 1984 kboehler@charter.net High School debater, College debater, Occasionally judge 0 Tabula Rasa > > > > > > > > I may be a little old school, but I like a well developed case from the affirmative team with strong evidential backup.
 * Judge Name **
 * High School Graduation Year **
 * Judge Email **
 * How would you describe your Policy Debate experience? **
 * How many rounds have you judged on this year's topic? **
 * What is the best descriptor of your judging style for policy debate? **
 * Judge Preferences **
 * ** Rate of Delivery ** Moderate
 * **Quality of Arguments** Well Developed
 * **Topicality** Vote on it often
 * **Counterplans** Sometimes acceptable
 * **Generic Disadvantages** Sometimes acceptable
 * **Conditional Negative** Positions Sometimes acceptable
 * ** Debate Theory Arguments ** Acceptable
 * **Kritik Arguments** Sometimes acceptable
 * Please indicate your overall judging paradigm. **

From the negative team I want to hear solid refutation of affirmative case using sign posts to make flowing easier. Counter plans are acceptable if affirmative plan is weak. However, plan should be specific and not 'canned'.

Strong clear speaking styles are necessary with both sides being very respectful of each other, while keeping arguments on topic.

I also expect to see productive use of prep time and respectful cross examinations.