Petrowski,+Paige

Petrowski, Paige 2015 ppetrowski7@gmail.com High School debater, College debater, Frequently judge 30 Tabula Rasa Overall, what is most important to me is for the debaters to tell me what to vote on, weigh impacts in the round, and explain the mechanisms of the Plan, CP, or K alt. I need to be told what I should vote on and how I should vote, otherwise I will default to the team I think debated better.
 * Judge Name **
 * High School Graduation Year **
 * Judge Email **
 * How would you describe your Policy Debate experience? **
 * How many rounds have you judged on this year's topic? **
 * What is the best descriptor of your judging style for policy debate? **
 * Judge Preferences **
 * ** Rate of Delivery ** Moderately Fast
 * ** Quality of Arguments ** Relatively many
 * **Topicality** Moderately
 * ** Counterplans ** Acceptable
 * ** Generic Disadvantages ** Acceptable
 * **Conditional Negative Positions** Acceptable
 * **Debate Theory Arguments** Acceptable
 * ** Kritik Arguments ** Acceptable
 * Please indicate your overall judging paradigm. **